What is the main purpose of the cadastral development project?
Country |
Document land ownership |
Improve land registration to support a land market |
Improve land management of land under customary tenure |
Improve land valuation and land taxation |
Improve land use planning and land management |
Improve recording of land users or owners |
Others |
Africa | |||||||
Botswana | x |
x |
x |
||||
Egypt | x |
x |
x |
x2 |
|||
Ghana | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
Magdagascar | x |
x |
x |
||||
Morocco, Juridic | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
Morocco National | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Namibia | x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
South Africa | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x5 |
|
Swaziland | x |
x |
|||||
Tanzania,Zanzibar | x |
||||||
Uganda | x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
Asia | |||||||
Bangladesh | x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
Bhutan | x |
x |
|||||
Cambodia | x |
x |
x |
x11 |
|||
China, BaoDing City | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
China, Xinji City | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Indonesia | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Jordan | x |
x |
|||||
Korea, South a | x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
Korea, South b | x |
x |
x |
||||
Nepal | x |
x |
x |
||||
Nepal, Kathmandu | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Philippines | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x4 |
Turkey | x8 |
||||||
Eastern Europe | |||||||
Latvia | x |
x |
x |
x |
|||
Poland | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Slovakia | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
Slovenia | x |
x |
x |
||||
The Czech Republic | x |
x7 |
|||||
Latin America | |||||||
Colombia | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
Costa Rica, Guadalupe | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x1 |
Costa Rica, Zapote | x |
x |
x |
||||
Cuba, Ciudad de la Habana | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x10 |
Ecuador | x |
||||||
El Salvador | x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Jamaica | x |
x |
x |
x3 |
|||
Uruguay | x |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which of the following issues are included in your project? The graphical/technical part
Africa | Computerization of land records | Digitization of cadastral maps | Surveying using GPS | Mapping using photogrammetry | Simple mapping based on aerial photos | |||||
Botswana | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Egypt | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Ghana | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
|||||
Jordan | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|||||
Madagascar | Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Morocco (the Juridical Cadastre Project) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Morocco (the National Cadastre Project) |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Namibia | No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
South Africa | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes- |
Yes |
|||||
Swaziland | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|||||
Tanzania, Zanzibar | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Uganda | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Asia | Computerization of land records | Digitization of cadastral maps | Surveying using GPS | Mapping using photogrammetry | Simple mapping based on aerial photos | |||||
Bangladesh | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|||||
Bhutan | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|||||
Cambodia | No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|||||
China, Bao Ding City | Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|||||
China, Xinji City | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Indonesia | Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
||||
Korea, Southa | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|||||
Korea, Southb | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Nepal, Kathmandu | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|||||
Nepal | No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|||||
Philippines | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Eastern Europe | Computerization of land records | Digitization of cadastral maps | Surveying using GPS | Mapping using photogram-metry | Simple mapping based on aerial photos | |||||
Latvia | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Poland | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Slovakia | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|||||
Slovenia | No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
The Czech Republic | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|||||
Turkey | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Latin America | Computerization of land records | Digitization of cadastral maps | Surveying using GPS | Mapping using photogram-metry | Simple mapping based on aerial photos | |||||
Colombia | Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|||||
Costa Rica, Guadalupe | Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|||||
Costa Rica, Zapote | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Cuba | Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|||||
Ecuador | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|||||
El Salvador | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Jamaica | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|||||
Uruguay | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Finances and costs/ How is the project financed
Africa | New Legislation | New Organization | Organizational Development | Cooperation with other bodies | ||||
Botswana | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||
Egypt | No |
No |
No |
No |
||||
Ghana | Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
||||
Jordan | Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Madagascar | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Morocco (the Juridical Cadastre Project) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
||||
Morocco (the National Cadastre Project) |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||
Namibia | Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
South Africa | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Swaziland | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||
Tanzania, Zanzibar | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Uganda | No |
No |
No |
No |
Asia | New Legislation | New Organization | Organizational Development | Cooperation with other bodies | ||||
Bangladesh | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||
Bhutan | No |
No |
No |
No |
||||
Cambodia | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||
China, Bao Ding City | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
China, Xinji City | No |
No |
No |
No |
||||
Indonesia | Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Korea, Southa | No |
No |
No |
No |
||||
Korea, Southb | No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
||||
Nepal, Kathmandu | Yes |
No |
No |
No |
||||
Nepal | No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Philippines | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Eastern Europe | New Legislation | New Organisation | Organisational Development | Cooperation with other bodies | ||||
Latvia | Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Poland | No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Slovakia | Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||
Slovenia | Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||
The Czech Republic | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||
Turkey | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Latin America | New Legislation | New Organisation | Organisational Development | Cooperation with other bodies | ||||
Colombia | No |
No |
No |
No |
||||
Costa Rica, Guadalupe | No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Costa Rica, Zapote | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||
Cuba | Yes |
No |
No |
No |
||||
Ecuador | No |
No |
No |
|||||
El Salvador | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Jamaica | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Uruguay | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Africa | Registration of land under customary tenure | Land Reforms | Participation of the people concerned and local administration | Land Use Planning and surveying | Land Valuation | ||||||
Botswana | No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||||
Egypt | No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||||
Ghana | Yes |
No |
Yes/ |
No |
No |
Yes |
|||||
Jordan | No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
||||||
Madagascar | Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||||
Morocco (the Juridical Cadastre Project) | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||||
Morocco (the National Cadastre Project) | No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
||||||
Namibia | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
||||||
South Africa | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||||
Swaziland | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
||||||
Tanzania, Zanzibar | Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||||
Uganda | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Asia | Registration of land under customary tenure | Land Reforms | Participation of the people concerned and local administration | Land Use Planning and surveying | Land Valuation | |||||||
Bangladesh | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|||||||
Bhutan | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
|||||||
Cambodia | No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|||||||
China, Bao Ding City | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||
China, Xinji City | No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||
Indonesia | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||
Korea, Southa | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|||||||
Korea, Southb | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|||||||
Nepal, Kathmandu | No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||
Nepal | No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||
Philippines | Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Eastern Europe | Registration of land under customary tenure | Land Reforms | Participation of the people concerned and local administration | Land Use Planning and surveying | Land Valuation | |||||
Latvia | Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Poland | Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Slovakia | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||
Slovenia | No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|||||
The Czech Republic | No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|||||
Turkey | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Latin America | Registration of land under customary tenure | Land Reforms | Participation of the people concerned and local administration | Land Use Planning and surveying | Land Valuation | |||||||
Colombia | No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|||||||
Costa Rica, Guadalupe | No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||
Costa Rica, Zapote | No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||
Cuba | No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|||||||
Ecuador | No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||||||
El Salvador | No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||
Jamaica | No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
|||||||
Uruguay | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Africa | Governmental funds in % | Donor organization in % and which organization | Loan from financial institutions in % and which organization | Other financing sources |
Botswana | 100 | |||
Egypt | cooperation between Egypt and USA | |||
Ghana | World Bank through the Technical Services Centre in Ghana. | |||
Jordan | 100, the budget of the department | |||
Madagascar | 20 | 80 | ||
Morocco (the Juridical Cadastre Project) |
financed from the budget of ACFCC*,which is based on revenues from charges of land registration | |||
Morocco (National Project) |
30 | 70, BIRD | ||
Namibia | 20 | 80, Ibis (Danish NGO) and the Ministry of Land , Resettlement and Rehabilitation | ||
South Africa | 100 | |||
Swaziland | 50 | 50, O.D.A | ||
Tanzania, Zanzibar | 15 | 85, FINNIDA | ||
Uganda |
Asia | Governmental funds in % | Donor organisation in % and which organisation | Loan from financial institutions in % and which organisation | Other financing sources |
Bangladesh | 20 | 80, Asian Development Bank | ||
Bhutan | 100, UNDP/BITS | |||
Cambodia | 4 million DM, GTZ German Government | approx 500,000 USD, World Bank | ||
China, Bao Ding City | 20 | 80 levy from users | ||
China, Xinji City | 40 | 60, BITS, Sweden | ||
Indonesia | 100, World Bank/AVSAID | |||
Korea, Southa | 100 | |||
Korea, Southb | No figures presented | |||
Nepal, Kathmandu | 100 | |||
Nepal | 100 | |||
Philippines | 30 | 70, BITS, Sweden |
Eastern Europe | Governmental funds in % | Donor organisation in % and which organisation | Loan from financial institutions in % and which organisation | Other financing sources |
Latvia | 67 | 23, BITS, Sweden | 10, World Bank | |
Poland | 100 | |||
Slovakia | 96,5 | 3,5, Project PHARE | ||
Slovenia | 90, pilot project | 10, World Bank | ||
The Czech Republic | 100, state budget | |||
Turkey | 80 | 20 international credits |
Latin America | Governmental funds in % | Donor organisation in % and which organisation | Loan from financial institutions in % and which organisation | Other financing sources |
Colombia | 100 | |||
Costa Rica, Guadalupe | 2,935 million USD | 7,623 million USD | ||
Costa Rica, Zapote | 100 | |||
Cuba | 100 | |||
Ecuador | 100%, BID | |||
El Salvador | 20 | 80 (which organization is not presented) | ||
Jamaica | 50 | 50, United Nations Investment Fund, UNIF | ||
Uruguay | 100 |
Africa | (a)What is the overall turn-over, (b) the time frame for the project? | (a) Any study of expected benefits of the reform?, (b) Benefits related to costs?,(c) The expected cost/benefit ratio? | What will be the cost for the project? (USD) |
Botswana | a) - b) - |
a) accurate
info.and taxation b) improve the revenue base c) 1:3 |
- |
Egypt | a) - b) 15 years, computerize the old system and produce digital maps |
a) - b) - c) - |
- |
Ghana | It was intended for two years, but that had not been possible | ||
Jordan, Amman | a) having
very modern and fully computerised department b) 2,5 years for the 1st phase |
||
Madagscar | Long-term | none | 10 USD/ha |
Morocco (the Juridical Cadastre Project) |
a) 100
million USD yearly regarding the 4.000.000 hectares not
registered b) - |
a) a system
answering for ownership, a title deed which is
unassailable b) c)- |
-20 USD/hectar including cadastral surveying and mapping |
Morocco (the National Cadastre Project) |
a)
490.000.000 dinars for the remaining 6.400.000 hectares b) |
a) none b) - c) - |
-8 USD/hectar including cadastral surveying and mapping |
Namibia | a) 170 000
USD b) 1 year (1995-1996) |
a) Some of
the expected benefits will be explained in the final
recommendations. Until now only general benefits from
other places in the world have been used to convince the
Ministry b) The benefits will always relate to the costs, and therefore it forms part of the argumentation. c) We do not know |
has not been calculated yet |
South Africa | a) b) 5 years |
a) to make
cadastral and topographical information available more
freely and accessible for planning, agriculture reform
and housing purposes b) tremendous socio-economic benefits - fairly high costs c) cannot be quantified |
-1 USD/per
parcel including cadastral surveying -0,1 USD/per title including cadastral surveying |
Swaziland | a) b) 3 years (1993-1996) |
a) Yes, -to improve land management -collection of urban land tax -to improve use of data storage b) not calculated c) not calculated |
- 15.00 USD/per parcel including cadastral surveying and mapping |
Tanzania, Zanzibar | a) 2 million
USD b) 1991-1995 |
a)
-confirmation of ownership -mortgaging for loans for agriculture and building b) - c) - |
impossible to estimate at this stage |
Asia | (a)What is the overall turn-over, (b) the time frame for the project? | (a) Any study of expected benefits of the reform?, (b) Benefits related to costs?,(c) The expected cost/benefit ratio? | What will be the cost for the project? (USD) |
Bangladesh | a) to
modernize our Land Informtion system. b) 2 years |
||
Bhutan | a) - b) - |
a) no b)(more is given on the legal aspect rather than on the fiscal) c) not worked out |
not applicable |
Cambodia | - | ||
China, Bao Ding City | a) - b) 1987-1990 cadastral survey 1991-1995 land valuation and cadastral system |
a) the work
is not complete b) - c) - |
- 50 USD/per parcel excluding cadastral system |
China, Xinji City | a) input: 90
sheets 1:1000 topographic maps, 139 sheets 1:500
cadastral maps, establish a multi-purpose cadastral
information system b) 3 years |
a) - b) - c) - |
-53,67
USD/per parcel including cadastral surveying and mapping
and ownership, excluding the cost of the equipment -89,44 USD/per title including the training and software, excluding the cost of the equipment |
Indonesia | a) project -
16 million USD, AVD 27 million USD b) 54 years |
a) bank
documentation not available b) - c) - |
has not been calculated yet |
Nepal, Kathmandu | a) - b) completion of ten districts in 5 years |
a) no b) the graphical and the numerical data acquired will be more accurate and can be used for valuation and taxation c) not calculated |
-12,27 USD/per parcel |
Nepal | a) - b) - |
a) - b) - c) - |
- |
Philippines | a) - b) - |
- | - |
Korea, Southa | a) - b) Jan. 1994 - Dec. 1995 |
a) - b) - c) - |
- |
Korea, Southb | a) - b) 3 years,1995-1997-the pilot project, will be performed in Changwon city |
a) - b) - c) - |
- |
Eastern Europe | (a)What is the overall turn-over, (b) the time frame for the project? | (a) Any study of expected benefits of the reform?, (b) Benefits related to costs?,(c) The expected cost/benefit ratio? | What will be the cost for the project? (USD) |
Latvia | a) - b) 7 years |
a) provision
of information 1) for real property rights, registration,
2) for real property taxation, 3) for land management b) impossible to forecast c) - |
- 135 USD/per
parcel including cadastral surveying and mapping -162 USD/per title including cadastral surveying and mapping |
Poland | a)
preliminary stage of concept b) |
a) uniform
land information system b) in the beginning- the costs could be higher than the benefits later- this can be changed c) 1:1 |
not estimated |
Slovakia | a) - b) - |
a) - b) - c) - |
-33 USD/per
parcel including cadastral surveying and mapping -60 USD/title including cadastral surveying and mapping |
Slovenia | a) - b) digitalization of boundaries by year 2000 |
a) -taxation -land management -market of parcels b) 1/2.5 in 10 years |
1.4 USD/per parcel including cadastral surveying and mapping |
The Czech Republic | a) - b) - |
a) benefit in
improving the access to cadastral data b) - c) - |
not estimated |
Turkey | a) a frame
project b) 10 years |
a)
-acceleration, productive economy, automation in the
field of land registry and cadastre b) decreasing man power and time consuming c) 50% |
-20 USD/per
parcel including cadastral surveying and mapping -6 USD/per title including title data inguts |
Latin America | (a)What is the overall turn-over, (b) the time frame for the project? | (a) Any study of expected benefits of the reform?, (b) Benefits related to costs?,(c) The expected cost/benefit ratio? | What will be the cost for the project? (USD) |
Costa Rica, Guadalupe | a) - b) the whole country in 15 years |
a) -to
improve property taxation and land rent changes - to serve a large number of purposes; land titling, land consolidation and land reform, nature conservation and land reform, city development and management b) in theory you invest one dollar and obtain four dollar c) 1:4 |
-52,2 USD/per parcel including cadastral surveying and mapping |
Costa Rica, Zapote | a) 51000 km2 b) 10 years |
a) collect
land taxes b) after the fourth year the benefit will be 4 USD c) 1:4 |
- |
Cuba | 2 years | ||
Ecuador | a) - b) - |
a) - b) - c) - |
- |
El Salvador | a) 20000 km2 b) 6 years |
a) to
improve: -economical aspect of legal cadastre -customers service -service for other purposes than legal cadastre -efficiency of legal cadastre -the quality of data, accuracy -to further improve the private sector b) 30 % c) 1:3 |
-(66) USD/per parcel including cadastral surveying and mapping |
Jamaica | a) b) schedule for full implementation , Jan 1996 |
a) - b) - c) - |
- |
Uruguay | a) - b) 5 years |
a) - b) c) the expected relation between benefits and costs: 7:1 |
-10 USD/per parcel excluding cadastral surveying and mapping |